When Even Physicians Struggle to Find Primary Care, the System Is Failing Patients
My search for a board-certified primary care physician exposed a larger problem: physician shortages, concierge barriers, and a system that is making equitable access harder to sustain.
Over the last several years, I have been searching for a board-certified primary care physician. I did not expect that search to become a window into one of the most troubling realities in American health care, but that is exactly what happened. Again and again, I encountered closed panels, long waits, and concierge practices requiring substantial annual fees simply for the privilege of joining. In many cases, these were not fees for enhanced services. They were fees for access itself.
I am a physician, and even with that background, this process was remarkably difficult. I understand the system, the terminology, and the landscape better than most people ever should have to. Even so, finding a primary care doctor felt unnecessarily complicated and discouraging. If this is challenging for a physician, it is certainly worse for the average patient. For people without professional networks, schedule flexibility, or the ability to absorb concierge fees, the barriers are even higher.
Primary care is the foundation of good medicine. It is where prevention happens, where chronic illness is managed over time, where symptoms are evaluated in context, and where trust is built through continuity. When patients cannot access that foundation, the consequences spread quickly. Problems that could have been addressed early are delayed. Continuity disappears. Urgent care centers and emergency departments absorb needs that belong in a stable outpatient relationship. Patients lose the benefit of having a physician who knows them over time and can recognize subtle changes before they become larger problems.
One response to the worsening shortage of primary care physicians has been greater reliance on nurse practitioners to fill the gaps. This deserves a more honest conversation than it usually gets. Physicians and nurse practitioners do not go through the same training. The depth, duration, and rigor of physician education and residency are fundamentally different. In some nurse practitioner pathways, clinical preparation includes relatively short periods of observation and limited supervised experiences that do not resemble the sustained, immersive practice environment of physician training. That difference matters for clinical judgment, for managing complexity, for recognizing unusual presentations, and for knowing when something that appears routine may actually be serious.
This is not about questioning the dedication of individual nurse practitioners. Many are hardworking and deeply committed to their patients. The concern is that our health care system increasingly acts as though different levels of training can be used interchangeably. Patients deserve honesty about who is caring for them and a system that does not respond to physician shortages by quietly lowering standards.
At the same time, concierge care is expanding in ways that deepen disparities. I understand why many physicians are drawn to these models. Traditional primary care has become extraordinarily difficult to sustain. Physicians are carrying overwhelming patient volumes, heavy administrative work, endless inbox management, prior authorization battles, and productivity pressures that leave too little time for thoughtful care. Many have little control over how they practice and less influence over decisions that directly affect their patients. Compensation in primary care has also declined relative to the demands, responsibility, and value of the work. In that environment, concierge care can look less like a luxury and more like a survival strategy.
That reality should concern all of us. Physicians are not moving away from traditional primary care because they care less. Many are trying to preserve their ability to practice medicine effectively and safely in a system that makes that harder every year.
The broader effect is a system in which access to physician-led primary care becomes increasingly limited for those who cannot pay extra for it. Every time a practice moves to a concierge model and shrinks its panel, the strain on everyone else increases. Patients with financial means may still be able to secure continuity and access. Others face fewer options, longer waits, and more fragmented care. Over time, that pushes us toward a health care system where timely access to a physician becomes something closer to a privilege than a baseline expectation.
This crisis is made worse by the uneven distribution of primary care physicians across the country. Some parts of the United States have far fewer physicians than their populations need, and those shortages are often most severe in rural and underserved communities. Geography has become a major factor in determining whether a person can access consistent, high-quality primary care.
These problems are the predictable result of policy choices and payment structures that have steadily devalued primary care. We depend on primary care to hold the system together, yet we make it less attractive, less supported, and less sustainable for the physicians expected to provide it. We continue to reward procedures far more generously than the cognitive, relational, and longitudinal work that keeps patients healthier over time. We ask primary care physicians to absorb more complexity while tolerating payment systems and administrative structures that undermine retention, morale, and autonomy.
Reform is urgently needed, and it has to go beyond simply producing more physicians. We do need to expand the physician workforce, especially in primary care, but that alone will not solve the problem if the practice environment remains unsustainable. What do we need?
We need meaningful incentives that make primary care a viable and respected career path.
We need fair compensation that reflects the complexity and importance of this work.
We need to reduce administrative burdens that consume clinical time and drain professional satisfaction.
We need to restore greater control to physicians over health care decisions and over the structure of their practices.
And we need serious strategies to address regional maldistribution so that access is not so heavily determined by zip code.
My own search over the last several years has made this impossible to ignore. When even physicians struggle to find a board-certified primary care physician, we should be honest about what that means for everyone else. Patients deserve a system that values physician training, protects access to high-quality care, and supports the clinicians trying to provide it. Right now, too many people are being asked to settle for less, wait longer, pay more, or go without.
I suspect many others, both inside and outside medicine, have seen the same trend from different angles. Have you experienced similar barriers when trying to find primary care? Have you seen the effects of closed panels, concierge conversion, or workforce gaps in your community or practice? I would be interested to hear how others are thinking about this, because access to care is becoming more fragile and more unequal, and we need a much more serious conversation about how to fix it.
A knowledgeable patient is a prepared patient. Learn how the system works to protect your health and your assets. “The Prepared Patient: Your Guide to Surviving the Health Care System” to be released in August 2026 and is available for preorder from Amazon, Barnes and Noble and Johns Hopkins University Press.